It's tough (and pretty stupid, IMHO) to compare them side-by-side: DRLVM has way more options to swizzle than RVM, and some of them are low-level ones. But anyway:
DRLVM (206 options to swizzle): 9317 runs, 5716 failures -> 61% failure rate RVM (89 options to swizzle): 13721 runs, 4584 failures -> 33% failure rate One could say that RVM is more reliable, but again, that could be the delusion. Thanks, Aleksey. On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 10:49 AM, Alexei Fedotov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Aleksey, > Nice work! How robust was DRLVM compared to Jikes? > > Thanks! > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Aleksey Shipilev > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 4:07 AM, Xiao-Feng Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Interesting and useful work! Surely the confs deserve careful >>> investigations. >> Yep. What I don't know yet, is how exactly to tackle all that stuff... >> What I know for sure is, the verification of issues have to be >> automated. >> >> On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 9:03 AM, xiaoming gu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Aleksey, what is "GA"? Thanks. -Xiaoming >> GA == Genetic Algorithm. >> >> Thanks, >> Aleksey. >> > > > > -- > С уважением, > Алексей Федотов, > ЗАО «Телеком Экспресс» >
