Sian January wrote: > I've been looking at the dependency from the auth module to awt, but I > don't think there's any work to be done there, except to change the > awt dependencies in the MANIFEST.MF to be optional. > There is only one class that depends on awt > (org.apache.harmony.auth.callback.DialogCallbackHandler), and I > believe for it to be instantiated a user would have to specify its > name via the auth.login.defaultCallbackHandler security property. If > that's right, then I think we could just assume that that won't/can't > be used if awt isn't installed. > I don't think it makes sense to move the class itself to awt as that > would introduce a dependency from awt-auth that doesn't already exist. > > Does that sound ok?
+1 Tim
