On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Jin Mingjian <[email protected]> wrote: > Xiao Feng: > > Thanks at all:) Do you see the moxie jvm? It seem developed by some > intel men. And this vm was tended to contribute to harmony some time. > I see a report about it recently. They said they hope the source will > put into the site at sf in 2007. But there are not..
Yes, I had been involved in Moxie project for a period but didn't keep up with its status then after. Also, I haven't looked into various JVM implementations, because of ACQ :) Thanks, xiaofeng > Jin > > 2009/1/8 Xiao-Feng Li <[email protected]>: >> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Jin Mingjian <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi, Xiao Feng: >>> >>> I 'm interesting in your "another simpler JVM implementation". Is it >>> public? And is there a simple working windows-friendly open source vm >>> using the harmony class library? I do some work to make joeq using >>> harmony harmony class library personally. (joeq, it is the only >>> windows-friendly meta-circular JVM) >> >> Mingjian, The JVM I used is not public available. >> >>> And Rui Chu, >>> The runtime system saving for a JVM seem the basic technque used in >>> some meta-circular JVM bootstrapping, such as jikers rvm, joeq, >>> although they use their own object layout and some others. >> >> Yes, this is what I thought as well... >> >> Thanks, >> xiaofeng >> >>> Jin Mingjian >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Managed Runtime Technology Center, Intel >> > -- Managed Runtime Technology Center, Intel
