I've been trying to recreate these errors, can anyone share the specific commands, settings and tools being used?
I'm trying this with the 3.5M4 builds and I can't even get the 'ant' test to run when Harmony is the bootstrapping JRE and the JRE running the actual tests. -Nathan On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 7:35 AM, Gregory Shimansky <[email protected]> wrote: > On 7 January 2009 Huang, Eric wrote: >> Did not cath this one earlier. What is the jrt.core.tests.builder about? It >> almost failed completely. > > It looks like almost all tests fail with the same exception message: > > Build path contains duplicate > entry: > 'D:harmony.cc/trunk/working_vm/build/windows_x86_msvc_release/deploy/jdk/jre/bin/default/gc_gen.jar' > for project 'Project' > > Interesting how there is no '/' or '\' after D: in the path name. Is it a > valid path in win32? > >> Eric >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: chunrong lai [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 12:32 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: testing for the newer EUT >> >> After works on HARMONY-6020 now we get 98.42% pass rate for 26416 test >> cases when running EUT35 in win32 platform as below. >> >> Tests >> Failures Errors Success rate >> org.eclipse.ui.tests 2143 >> 19 1 99.07% >> org.eclipse.jdt.core.tests.model 11138 >> 0 6 99.95% >> org.eclipse.jdt.core.tests.compiler 10216 >> 17 0 99.83% >> org.eclipse.jdt.core.tests.builder 195 >> 0 184 5.64% >> org.eclipse.jdt.core.tests.performance 1 >> 0 0 100.00% >> org.eclipse.team.tests.core 17 >> 0 0 100.00% >> org.eclipse.update.tests 131 >> 0 0 100.00% >> org.eclipse.core.expressions.tests 98 >> 0 0 100.00% >> org.eclipse.osgi.tests 504 >> 48 101 70.44% >> org.eclipse.core.tests.resources 914 >> 7 29 96.06% >> org.eclipse.core.tests.runtime 389 >> 1 0 99.74% >> org.eclipse.compare.tests 80 >> 0 0 100.00% >> org.eclipse.ant.tests.core 85 >> 0 0 100.00% >> org.eclipse.releng.tests 5 >> 0 0 100.00% >> org.eclipse.jdt.text.tests 500 >> 0 0 100.00% >> >> Totally: 26416 >> 92 321 98.42% >> >> More details are posted in HARMONY-6062. >> >> regards, >> chunrong >> Managed Runtime Technology Center, Intel >> >> On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 3:25 AM, Nathan Beyer <[email protected]> wrote: >> > I posted a comment about this on the JIRA issue - I think this is >> > related to a class loading problem I found a few weeks ago. The >> > ClassNotFoundError looked familiar - I reduced it to a complex >> > cyclical class dependency that DRLVM couldn't load. >> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6020 >> > >> > On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 10:32 PM, chunrong lai <[email protected]> >> > >> > wrote: >> > > hi, colleagues: >> > > I'd like to update my running status of EUT35 with you. As reported >> > > in HARMONY-6062, I have not been able to run EUT35 with Harmony >> > > (although it >> > >> > is >> > >> > > fine to run EUT33 with it). >> > > The failure can be reproduced with the long java command line option >> > > "java -jar >> > > eclipse\plugins\org.eclipse.equinox.launcher_1.0.200.v20080825-1800.jar >> > > -application org.eclipse.test.uitestapplication -data workspace -dev >> > > bin >> > >> > formatter=org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.XMLJUnitResultForm >> >atter,d:\eclipse-testing\eclipse\org.eclipse.jdt.text.tests.JdtTextTestSui >> >te.xml >> > >> > > -testPluginName org.eclipse.jdt.text.tests -className >> > > org.eclipse.jdt.text.tests.JdtTextTestSuite -os win32 -ws win32 -arch >> > >> > x86". >> > >> > > I also attached the output file in the JIRA, where I guess the root >> > > cause are from some Harmony jar file constrains, "!MESSAGE Missing >> > > Constraint: Bundle-RequiredExecutionEnvironment: JavaSE-1.6". >> > > Another interesting point is that after the test case had >> > > successfully runed (so the configuration phase has been finished) with >> > > RI (with above command), it would be no problem for Harmony to run it >> > > again. This >> > >> > somehow >> > >> > > supports our guess of some verification failures in the configuration >> > >> > phase. >> > >> > > On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 8:37 PM, chunrong lai <[email protected]> >> > >> > wrote: >> > >> I am running the tests, not finished yet. >> > >> >> > >> Thanks. >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 9:28 PM, Tim Ellison <[email protected] >> > > >> > >wrote: >> > >>> Are you looking at this Chunrong? >> > >>> >> > >>> Tim Ellison wrote: >> > >>> > chunrong lai wrote: >> > >>> >> So far Harmony has only EUT3.3 in testing. It looks like it is >> > >> > time >> > >> > >>> to >> > >>> >> > >>> >> include EUT3.4 now. Your suggestions/comments are welcome. >> > >>> > >> > >>> > Skip 3.4 and go straight to the 3.5 stream tests [1]. >> > >>> > >> > >>> > It would be prudent to test using the latest milestone build first >> > >> > [2], >> > >> > >>> > but if we want to remain current then catching any issues earlier >> > >>> > in >> > >> > the >> > >> > >>> > integration builds would be the thing to do. >> > >>> > >> > >>> > How about running then using the Apache infrastructure, which would >> > >> > give >> > >> > >>> > us better control of the jobs and insight into the failures? >> > >>> > >> > >>> > [1] http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/downloads/ >> > >>> > [2] >> > >> > http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/downloads/drops/S-3.5M3-200810301917/ >> >index.php >> > >> > >>> > Regards, >> > >>> > Tim > > > > -- > Gregory >
