Yes. Sorry for not being clear. On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Tim Ellison <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ah, just found > > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/harmony/enhanced/buildtest/trunk/infra/adaptors/snapshot/ > > is that what you are talking about? > > > Tim Ellison wrote: > > With the classlib code, you can run the tests against any JRE using... > > > > cd working_classlib > > ant -Dtest.jre.home=$WORKSPACE/harmony/target/hdk/jdk/jre test > > > > > > Once I have built a snapshot, is there some way to run the build test > > framework's short integrity cycle [1] against it? The scripts want to > > check out all the JDK source and build it again 8-0 > > > > [1] http://harmony.apache.org/subcomponents/buildtest/howto.html#Short > > > > Regards, > > Tim > > > > Alexei Fedotov wrote: > >> Tim, to reuse build results please use "snapshot" target. > >> > >> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Tim Ellison <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >>> Sean Qiu wrote: > >>>> AFAIK, we can modify the <BTI>/adaptor/classlib/adaptor.xml, add the > >>>> property for setup task. > >>>> > >>>> Index: adaptor.xml > >>>> =================================================================== > >>>> --- adaptor.xml (revision 740179) > >>>> +++ adaptor.xml (working copy) > >>>> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ > >>>> inheritAll="false"/> > >>>> <!-- Use BTI staff to execute Ant Build in new process --> > >>>> <exec-ant dir="${trunk.dir}" targets="rebuild"> > >>>> + <sysproperty key="use.libstdc++6" value="true"/> > >>>> <sysproperty key="keep.working" value="true"/> > >>>> <!-- workaround on classlib-build's > >>> InvocationTargetException > >>>> --> > >>>> <jvmarg line="-Xmx1000M"/> > >>>> > >>>> I can't find a quick solution without modification, since it is > >>> indirectly > >>>> called. > >>> Yep, that's the solution I came up with too. > >>> > >>> I also tried setting the property in .harmony-classlib.properties but > >>> that didn't work for some reason I've not figured out yet. > >>> > >>> > >>> Incidentally, I had tried to reuse the build results, rather than have > >>> the BTI suite re-checkout and build everything again, i.e. i wanted to > >>> test an existing build. Again, maybe I'm just not looking in the right > >>> places but I don't see how to achieve that either :-( > >>> > >>> making slow progress... > >>> Tim > >>> > >>> > >> > > > -- С уважением, Алексей Федотов, ЗАО <<Телеком Экспресс>>
