Chunrong, Please don't be shy helping people with BTI. The help from Stepan and Aleksey Varlamov (god praise their dedication to these fantastic scripts) I got in addition to README was the most valuable and welcome.
Thanks! On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 5:15 AM, chunrong lai <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Tim Ellison <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Egor Pasko wrote: >> > On the 0x54C day of Apache Harmony Tim Ellison wrote: >> >> Egor Pasko wrote: >> >>> On the 0x547 day of Apache Harmony Tim Ellison wrote: >> >>>> I now have an account [1] on the ASF Hudson machine, so can host some >> >>>> more visible build and test projects there. >> >>>> >> >>>> To get things started, I created a simple build job which will send >> mail >> >>>> to the alerts@ list if the compile fails. >> >>>> >> >>>> http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/view/Harmony/ >> >>> Awesome! Now I do not have to ask people out there to check my patches >> >>> on x86_64 :) Thanks, Tim! >> >>> >> >>>> Next step is to pass the results of that build into a short integrity >> >>>> testing cycle. >> >>> I am seeing results of short integrity testing runs on Hudson. Does it >> >>> mean this is done already? >> >> It's still work in progress, but yes, just about done. >> >> >> >> I enhanced the 'build' job to include a very basic test (at this point >> >> it just runs the pack200 Junit tests. This is to ensure that not only >> >> the build completes successfully, but that it also runs a very simple >> >> set of 'sniff' tests. >> >> >> >> I'm open to suggestions about what the sniff tests should be, but they >> >> should take next to no time at all to run after the build completes. >> > >> > 'sniff' testing in basic build is a good idea. And I guess pack200 >> > unit tests should be just the right amount to be next to no time. >> > >> >> Once the short integration testing is working I'll redirect failures to >> >> the alerts list too, and schedule that to run frequently (being mindful >> >> that we are on a shared machine resource). Then I'll move on to running >> >> longer tests, etc. etc. >> > >> > cool, ehwa running is already very useful >> >> I'm still struggling with the BTI, trying to adapt it to do the right >> thing. > > > Not sure if I can help here. I myself setup BTI in my servers according to > the readme files before. > As to the issue of -Duse.libstdc++6=true, I also locally modify the adaptor > to include the option thus to continue testing. > > >> >> >> >>> Is there a plan to set up an x86 build on Hudson? How much more >> >>> platforms/configurations is reasonable to run without making others >> >>> feel that we are wasting machine resources? >> >> AFAIK there is not a wide range of machine architectures available as >> >> Hudson build machines. I will discuss with the infra team what we can >> >> get available. >> > >> > we could build and run a 32 bit binary on an x86_64 machine, but that >> > is likely a pain to set up our BTI for this. Is there support for >> > virtual machines? :) >> >> I believe they are hosting them as virtual hosts already, so it is a >> case of asking for other architectures to be made available. I wanted >> to get a basic build / test going on one machine first. >> >> >> I think we can use more resources on the current machine if you can >> >> think of other configurations you want to run. >> > >> > It might be helpful to build release configuration so that users are >> > able to pick new binary snapshots anytime. (this would sound very >> > cool: "We don't have fresh 32 bit binaries, try our x86_64 builds). >> >> The builds are in release mode by default anyway. >> The latest good build is available at... >> >> http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/view/Harmony/job/Harmony-1.5-head-linux-x86_64/lastSuccessfulBuild/ >> >> > Since DRLVM is not in a very active development we may save resources >> > and take DRLVM binary from the latest binary release. >> >> Rebuilding it is no problem. >> >> > I'll be glad to also find 2 runtime configurations in testing (client >> > and server). But .. not very critical. >> >> I'll bear it in mind once I am running tests. >> >> Regards, >> Tim >> > -- С уважением, Алексей Федотов, ЗАО <<Телеком Экспресс>>
