On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Mark Hindess <[email protected]> wrote: > I've checked in a quick fix (including a fix for the java code which > might not be idea) at r747301. Comments welcome on improving the fix. > > Niklas, many thanks for reporting this and producing a concise test > case. Let us know if the next snapshot doesn't show improvement and if > you find any more issues.
I will rerun our testcases when a new snapshot with this rev becomes available (or if it already is?) and let you know. Thanks for the quick fix! /niklas
