Thanks Chunrong, I also find same situation when I run some other tests, by the way.
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 2:07 PM, chunrong lai <[email protected]> wrote: > I tried to investigated the issue but have not succeed. > (1) Since it is an intermittent error in my machines, I guess that it is a > threading-related issue. I then tried previous of drlvm and could still > observe the intermittent failure in M5 (r629320). I also checked RI and VME > and have not seen such problem. > (2) Observed same stacktrace, I see there is no problem to parse such > files > in a single-threaded environment, same as what Charles observed. Looking > more in EUT35 source, I see that EUT open the file with BufferedInputStream > and then pass the stream to SAXParser. The stacktrace itself likely shows > that we can read nothing from the BufferedInputStream. I guessed that > there > might be some problems in drlvm when cooperated with the threaded > BufferedInputStream but have not verified it. > > On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Charles Lee <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > I'm running EUT releng test on the linux machine. The test is always > > failed. Here is something I found, and need some help: > > 1. I have encountered a " [Fatal Error] :1:20: The version is required in > > the XML declaration." when running java-test target just like what Lai > > ChunRong mentioned in HARMONY-6062< > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6062>, > > but without any luck to pass the test occasionally. > > 2. With the -consolelog, I found the log file (attached), and says > > "java.io.IOException: The version is required in the XML declaration." > The > > exception is thrown by the eclipse ProfileParser, which is parsing a > profile > > (attached). The profile is complete. The stack trace contains no > information > > about harmony. With these information, I guess there maybe something > wrong > > when the SAXParser parse a file. So I have run a test to check SAXParser > > only to find there is no problem to parse the same log. > > 3. I have tested the relEng with RI. RI passed the configuration phase, > but > > will setup a eclipse workbench and never close it. Harmony with current > ibm > > vm behaves the same. > > 4. I have tested the relEng on windows. The relEng test passed but > behavior > > different from what it does on linux. No workbench is setup. I have > checked > > the test.xml about the relEng test, find this line in the setupcompare: > > "only run compare test on Linux machine since it is the fastest > > machine. Also, the compare tool only parses feature.xmls so it only needs > to > > be run on one machine" > > On linux, target setupcompare will be run. It will download a eclipse > > with older version and change some configuration to compare with the > newest > > one. I guess here is reason what makes difference. > > > > Any idea? > > > > -- > > Yours sincerely, > > Charles Lee > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Yours sincerely, > > Charles Lee > > > > > -- Yours sincerely, Charles Lee
