Agree, I don't think apply new patch is a good idea in this moment. It may introduce new issues we don't know.
It makes more sense right now to revert back to a safe point. We can fix them in next milestone. 2009/3/25 Tim Ellison <t.p.elli...@gmail.com>: > Regis wrote: >> Sian January wrote: >>> 8. Dacapo benchmark failure HARMONY-6041 >> >> I have found the cause of this regression, and had a initial patch, but >> still has 1 test failure in WinFileTest. So I suggest revert r727327 if >> it blocked M9. > > Yes, I think that we should probably roll back r727327 and re-open > HARMONY-6041. > > It seems that the patch was not sufficient, and the subsequent attempts > to fix things (HARMONY-6090, HARMONY-6091, HARMONY-6092) have not been > applied, and may cause further disruption. > > Since the original problem was found by inspection, I propose we leave > it as a known issue with M9 and try again after the code freeze. > > Thoughts? > > Regards, > Tim > > -- Best Regards Sean, Xiao Xia Qiu
