On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Tim Ellison <t.p.elli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dan Bornstein wrote:
>> Would the following be a useful and safe improvement over the above?:
>> if (float1 == float2 && 0.0f != (float1 + float2)) {
>
> In fact, since you have the ==, why is it not sufficient to say
> (float1 == float2 && 0.0f != float1)Good point! -dan
