+1
Oliver Deakin wrote: > Hi all, > > It's been a week since I sent out the initial mail about this > contribution and opinion seems positive so I'd like to open a vote to > officially accept the contribution. > > [ ] +1 Accept this contribution > [ ] -1 Reject this contribution because... > > I'll conclude the vote in 3 days as usual, unless anyone needs more time. > > Regards, > Oliver > > > Oliver Deakin wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> A little while ago, IBM created a mirror of the Java 6 jdktools branch >> so that we could start bringing Harmony JDWP into the IBM Java >> releases. We began working in that mirror because it was convenient >> for our internal builds, with a plan to reflect all changes we made >> back into Harmony as we went. Unfortunately, as deadlines drew in and >> releases came and went those plans did not come into fruition - until >> now :) >> >> I'd like to announce the contribution of an enhanced Java 6 level JDWP >> agent and socket transport layer. It has been attached to HARMONY-6187 >> [1] for everyone to try out - please take a look. It has the following >> enhancements: >> - A large number of bug fixes. >> - Ported to a wide variety of platforms - Linux x86/x86_64, Linux PPC >> 32/64, zLinux 31/64, Windows x86/x86_64, AIX PPC 32/64 and zOS 31/64. >> - As part of the porting process, all non-portable C++ usage has been >> removed and rewritten, particularly use of C++ standard libraries. >> - JSR 45 support implemented. The new JDWP agent allows debugging of >> non-Java stratum code running on the VM, for example JSPs. >> - Significant performance improvements. >> >> All authors already have ACQs recorded. There may be some more work to >> be done to get the new JDWP functioning 100% with Harmony, but I'd >> rather do that work out in the open once it is committed. Please let >> me know if there are any objections/comments to this contribution! >> I'll give it a few days and then start a vote. >> >> Regards, >> Oliver >> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6187 >> >> >
