In message <4a2d2561.3030...@gmail.com>, Tim Ellison writes: > > The first thing I tried after successfully building from source, was > java -version. > > In M9 it prints out: > c:\harmony-jdk-761593\jre\bin>java -version > Apache Harmony Launcher : (c) Copyright 1991, 2008 The Apache Software > Foundation or its licensors, as applicable. > java version "1.5.0" > pre-alpha : not complete or compatible > svn = r761593, (Apr 3 2009), Windows/ia32/msvc 1310, release build > http://harmony.apache.org > > but in the M10 candidate it only prints: > c:\apache-harmony-src-r781724\target\hdk\jdk\jre\bin>java -version > java version "1.5.0" > Apache Harmony (1.5.0) > DRLVM (11.2.0) > > which is a regression IMHO, and so I'm inclined to vote -1 on this > release candidate. Besides the all important copyright statement > missing, when we gather JIRAs we ask people to tell us the version they > are running and without the specific platform/revision it is useless.
I agree. > The regression seems to have come in as r763589. Oliver changed this but he's not around so I'd like to revert this commit[0]. Any other committers approve this? Regards, Mark. [0] It is a good idea though and I'll re-commit it after M10 and think about what is required to fix it properly.
