On 15/06/2009, Mark Hindess <mark.hind...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > In message <4a366a6d.8020...@googlemail.com>, Oliver Deakin writes: > > > > Thanks Mark - just back from holiday now and catching up on mail. I've > > just committed (r784811) a further patch so -version gives us the > > correct copyright and revision number info. It also moves the handling > > of -showversion (and -showversion:extended) to the Version class. You > > should now see: > > > > >java -version > > Apache Harmony Launcher : (c) Copyright 1991, 2009 The Apache Software > > Foundation or its licensors, as applicable. > > java version "1.5.0" > > Apache Harmony (1.5.0) > > DRLVM (11.2.0) > > pre-alpha : not complete or compatible > > svn = r784759, (Jun 15 2009), Windows/ia32/msvc 1310, release build > > http://harmony.apache.org > > > > >java -showversion HelloWorld > > Apache Harmony Launcher : (c) Copyright 1991, 2009 The Apache Software > > Foundation or its licensors, as applicable. > > java version "1.5.0" > > Apache Harmony (1.5.0) > > DRLVM (11.2.0) > > pre-alpha : not complete or compatible > > svn = r784759, (Jun 15 2009), Windows/ia32/msvc 1310, release build > > http://harmony.apache.org > > Hello World! > > > > which I think looks about right, if a little verbose. The :extended > > option gives the full classlib module breakdowns, and works with both > > -version and -showversion. > > What do you think? > > > Excellent. I've added some trivial checks in r784993 to try to make > sure we don't break it again. > > One thing I wondered about while trying to fix this for M10 was that it > would be nice if it actually said "Milestone 10" in the "java -version" > output (probably as well as the svn revision).
Good idea; it would be nice if the "java.version" and "java.runtime.version" properties also included the build details, as is done for the Sun JVM, for example: java.runtime.version=1.5.0_18-b02 java.version=1.5.0_18 > Regards, > > Mark > > >
