On 24/Nov/2009 08:49, Mark Hindess wrote: > Please compare the votes on our last release thread: > > http://markmail.org/thread/ih4gtirzvwqnveih > > with those on a similar thread on the apr dev list: > > http://markmail.org/thread/zpitcpl5kvbfir4a > > I rather like the style of the apr vote. Voting and saying what you > did to evaluate the release puts the votes in context and gives anyone > reading the vote thread a degree of confidence that if the release makes > it out the door it will be of reasonable quality. > > As the originator of a vote, it makes me nervous when I see > significantly more +1 votes than downloads. The point of voting +1 > is to approve the artifacts for release. Personally, I'd be very > embarrassed if we released something with an obvious bug and I'd voted > +1 for it. There will undoubtedly be times when I'll vote +0 if I've > not had time to test to my own satisfaction. > > Of course, the actual vote is a matter for the individual but I'd like > to encourage everyone to put their vote in context if/when we come to > vote on 5.0M12 and/or 6.0M1.
+1, after reading the e-mail in ISO-8859-1 using Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 and agreeing with it's contents in their entirety :-) Tim
