On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 1:15 AM, Tony Wu <wuyue...@gmail.com> wrote: > will the two ways result in different testing results? >
Yeah! The old way basically doesn't work ... i was just testing the trunk. > On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Nathan Beyer <ndbe...@apache.org> wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 3:05 AM, Mark Hindess >> <mark.hind...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>> >>> In message <3b3f27c60912101902u5c49e5c2o3b7fb9f300833...@mail.gmail.com>, >>> Nathan Beyer writes: >>>> >>>> I've been doing testing on the java 6 branch and was looking over the >>>> results and noticed that the version info reports 1.5.0 ... I thought >>>> we did something about that? I think I have the build setup correctly, >>>> though maybe not. >>> >>> There are two ways to build the java6 branch. The "old" way is: >>> >>> svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/harmony/enhanced/trunk hy6 >>> cd hy6 >>> ant -Djava6=true populate-src >>> ant -Djava6=true >>> >>> and the new way: >>> >>> svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/harmony/enhanced/branches/java6 hy6 >>> cd hy6 >>> ant populate-src >>> ant >>> >>> I suspect that you are using the "old" way and not supplying the >>> -Djava6=true parameter to the build. (Previously the -Djava6=true >>> parameter only affected the populate-src target but now it affects the >>> build too.) >>> >>> I think we should deprecate/remove the "old" way to avoid this confusion. >> >> Oh ... let me try that. Yes, we should remove any "old" ways. >> >>> >>> -Mark. >>> >>> >>> >>> >> > > > > -- > Tony Wu > China Software Development Lab, IBM >
