On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Mark Hindess <mark.hind...@googlemail.com>wrote:
> > In message > <3b3f27c61001192003j58c669f2m2fa8cb94acadf...@mail.gmail.com>, Nathan > Beyer writes: > > > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 8:30 PM, Ray Chen <clrayc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I think it is EMMA's report. > > > > I was able to figure out that. > > :-) > > > > Maybe we should find a place to put these reports. So we can know > > > exactly what test coverage rate we have got for each module > > > > It's the integration into the build system that's of interest. > > I've temporarily placed a copy of the baseline results at: > > > http://people.apache.org/~hindessm/emma/<http://people.apache.org/%7Ehindessm/emma/> > > But I strongly agree with Nathan, it would be very, very helpful to get > this work integrated with the rest of the build system. In particular, > it would then enable us to make use of the hudson emma plugin so we have > regular reports and can track progress. > > I'm happy to help to achieve this goal. Perhaps as a first step, the > current method for producing the report could be documented/described? > > Regards, > Mark. > > > [1] describe the details. And Sean have done some work to integrate Emma to BTI [2], but I'm not clear about the current status. [1] http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/coverageEMMA [2] http://markmail.org/thread/3vqgijetuieh2a2a
