Agree. The test on my laptop is not so good yet. On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 7:41 PM, Ray Chen <clrayc...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Oliver Deakin > <oliver.dea...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> On 20/01/2010 11:18, Mark Hindess wrote: >>> >>> In message<4d9fb1a01001200154u780476d6k570d6bb3516ba...@mail.gmail.com>, >>> Ray >>> Chen writes: >>> >>>> >>>> Hi Mark, >>>> >>>> I have a question, what conditions should java6 satisfy so that we can >>>> release it? >>>> >>> >>> We'll follow the same process as we do for java5/trunk. >>> >>> >>>> >>>> All the tests passed? :) >>>> >>> >>> That would be nice, but we don't hold the java5 releases to that >>> standard so I see no reason to apply it to java6. >>> >> >> Agreed - I think getting the M1 for java6 into a position where we can agree >> that the failing tests are not blockers for release is really what we're >> aiming for. I've just had a look in JIRA at the bugs targeted for 6.0M1 and >> I only see 1 result, HARMONY-6330. One thing that I think is important for >> us to get the M1 release out the door is to have a realistic set of bugs in >> JIRA to represent the current state of the build and I don't think that is >> true at the moment. I'm rerunning the 6.0 tests on the latest federated >> build - I'll post the results here once I have them and I aim to raise JIRAs >> for all the failures (and fix some if I can) so we have a reasonable view of >> what is required to reach M1. >> >> Regards, >> Oliver >> >>> Regards, >>> -Mark >>> >>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Mark Hindess >>>> <mark.hind...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Since we are not making much progress towards a java6 milestone release >>>>> and the code has been frozen for much too long, I think we should >>>>> abandon the idea and postpone the release until we do the next java5 >>>>> milestone. >>>>> >>>>> If no one speaks up against this, then I will send a mail declaring the >>>>> code freeze over tomorrow. >>>>> >>>>> I'm not convinced having the milestones offset by a week really helps >>>>> much and suggest that next time we do a milestone release for java5 we >>>>> do a java6 release at the same time. =A0(I'm not convinced this will >>>>> work >>>>> either but it can't really be worse so I think we should try it.) >>>>> >>>>> What do you think? >>>>> >>>>> -Mark. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> --=20 >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Ray Chen >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Oliver Deakin >> Unless stated otherwise above: >> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number >> 741598. >> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU >> >> > > > > -- > Regards, > > Ray Chen >
-- Tony Wu China Software Development Lab, IBM
