On 09/Mar/2010 15:57, Mark Hindess wrote: > In message <4b966475.1060...@gmail.com>, Tim Ellison writes: >> On 09/Mar/2010 14:53, Mark Hindess wrote: >>> It feels like we have some consensus. So, please can people sanity >>> check the binary artifacts in: >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~hindessm/milestones/ >> Will do. > > Thanks.
The binaries look sane to me. Basic sniff testing works fine. (It would be advisable to upgrade your signing key to 4096bit at some point.) Regards, Tim >>> I'll aim to move them to the /dist/ tree tomorrow or earlier if I >>> get confirmation that they've been checked. >> What's the plan for restructuring the dist directory to accommodate >> the 6.0 milestones? >> >> /dist/harmony/milestones/5.0/M13 >> /dist/harmony/milestones/6.0/M1 >> >> and leave the existing archive directories >> >> /dist/harmony/milestones/M1 >> ... > > This was the option that I had in mind. > > Additionally, I was thinking that I'd probably create symlinks for: > > /dist/harmony/milestones/5.0/M1 => ../M1 > /dist/harmony/milestones/5.0/M2 => ../M2 > > and remove them once they'd made it to the archive. This would mean > there'd be a single archive URL to reference all the 5.0 milestone > releases. > >> or maybe >> >> /dist/harmony/milestones/M13 >> /dist/harmony/milestones/6.0M1 > > Ick! > >> or ?? >> >>> Thanks for helping move this forward. >> I'll help to update the download page if that helps. > > Excellent. Thanks. > > Regards, > Mark. > > >
