In case anyone is wondering (I know I would be but perhaps it is just me) then the reason I did this copy rather than doing the merge of the equivalent change from federated trunk to the federated branches/java6 tree is that I think committing the merge would have resulted in transmitting the whole of drlvm where as the copy happens on the server.
It will all come out the same when I finish doing the merges shortly. Regards, Mark. In message <20100322214715.3c9772388...@eris.apache.org>, hinde...@apache.org writes: > > Author: hindessm > Date: Mon Mar 22 21:47:14 2010 > New Revision: 926362 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=926362&view=rev > Log: > Copy drlvm/trunk (there was no drlvm java6 branch) to branches/java6/drlvm. > > Added: > harmony/enhanced/branches/java6/drlvm/ (props changed) > - copied from r926361, harmony/enhanced/drlvm/trunk/ > > Propchange: harmony/enhanced/branches/java6/drlvm/ > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > - > --- svn:ignore (added) > +++ svn:ignore Mon Mar 22 21:47:14 2010 > @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ > +.cdtproject > +.project > +.settings > +deploy > > Propchange: harmony/enhanced/branches/java6/drlvm/ > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > - > --- svn:mergeinfo (added) > +++ svn:mergeinfo Mon Mar 22 21:47:14 2010 > @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ > +/harmony/enhanced/trunk/working_vm:476396-920147 > +/incubator/harmony/enhanced/trunk/working_vm:423974-476394 >
