In message <4bacbaec.1090...@gmail.com>, Tim Ellison writes:
>
> On 26/Mar/2010 13:35, Mark Hindess wrote:
> > In message <201003231121.o2nbloyc031...@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com>,
> > Mark Hindess writes:
> >> In message <201003231053.o2narjqa003...@d12av01.megacenter.de.ibm.com>,
> >> "Mark Hindess" writes:
> >>> *sign* I thought I'd finally got to the end of all this but I was
> >>> about to create the INFRA jira to get the new federated build git
> >>> mirror created and it occurs to me that the location of the federated
> >>> build is less than idea.
> >>>
> >>> In particular, the federated trunk, tags and branches are all under:
> >>>
> >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/harmony/enhanced
> >>>
> >>> which actually contains:
> >>>
> >>> admin/
> >>> branches/
> >>> buildtest/
> >>> classlib/
> >>> classlibadapter/
> >>> common_resources/
> >>> contrib_archive/
> >>> drlvm/
> >>> jchevm/
> >>> jdktools/
> >>> microemulator/
> >>> sandbox/
> >>> tags/
> >>> tools/
> >>> trunk/
> >>>
> >>> I'm not sure if the git mirroring can cope with this (I suspect it
> >>> can). Regardless, it would seem more sensible to have the federated
> >>> build under a subdirectory such as:
> >>>
> >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/harmony/enhanced/j2se
> >>>
> >>> or something.
> >
> > I still think this is a good idea. I don't like "j2se" though so
> > I think just "java" might be better. That is, moving:
> >
> > harmony/enhanced/trunk => harmony/enhanced/java/trunk
> > harmony/enhanced/branches => harmony/enhanced/java/branches
> > harmony/enhanced/tags => harmony/enhanced/java/tags
>
> I like that name better too.
>
> > If no one speaks up I'm going to go ahead with this (final?) move on
> > Monday 29th. I will use svn copies as before but I think this time
> > I will add <fail> messages to the top-level build files in the old
> > locations to help prevent mistaken commits.
> >
> > Once that is done, I will also raise the INFRA JIRA to
> > get the new git mirror created.
>
> I expect we have a number of web/wiki pages to update too with the new
> location.
Yeah. Fixing the web site shouldn't be too difficult[0] but I'm
not sure how to easily search/replace on the wiki. There are also
a number of other things that need updating such as removing the
populate-src steps from the build.xml files and corresponding sections
from instructions. These are on my todo list.
Regards,
Mark.
[0] Except that my recent commits don't seem to have made the staging
web site.
