I have a problem with fetch-depends on the Java 6 branch - the bsf dependency is out of date, so should be fixed before the release. I've raised it here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6513
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Catherine Hope < catherine.v.h...@googlemail.com> wrote: > I also see these 2 tests failing in the same way. It seems to be caused by > Regis' commit 944119 "SocketChannelImpl.SocketAdapter's remote address > should be updated after channel connected" on 14/05/2010. It could be that > the tests are invalid though - the first one is checking that the > SocketAddress returned by getRemoteAddress() is a different object to the > one that was passed to connect(), though as SocketAddress is immutable would > this cause a problem? > > > On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Oliver Deakin < > oliver.dea...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> Running the tests on a java 5 federated tree on Windows XP x86 the only >> failures I don't recognise are: >> org.apache.harmony.nio.tests.java.nio.channels.SocketChannelTest >> - testSocket_Block_BasicStatusAfterConnect fails with >> "junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected not same >> at >> org.apache.harmony.nio.tests.java.nio.channels.SocketChannelTest.assertSocketAfterConnect(SocketChannelTest.java:495)" >> - testSocket_NonBlock_BasicStatusAfterConnect fails with >> "junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: null >> at >> org.apache.harmony.nio.tests.java.nio.channels.SocketChannelTest.assertSocketBeforeConnect(SocketChannelTest.java:453)" >> >> >> If I run against the RI I also see these two test methods failing but with >> a different error message: >> "junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:<-1> but was:<0> >> at >> org.apache.harmony.nio.tests.java.nio.channels.SocketChannelTest.assertSocketBeforeConnect(SocketChannelTest.java:457)" >> >> Does anyone else see this? >> >> Regards, >> Oliver >> >> >> On 14/05/2010 23:48, Mark Hindess wrote: >> >>> Just a reminder that we are now in gearing up for milestone releases so >>> we are in full code freeze across all code streams. No commits from >>> now until the milestone releases are completed without two committers >>> approval via this list. >>> >>> We should track issues that must be fixed with JIRA using the "Fix for" >>> field. To see the current must fix issues visit the Harmony JIRA page >>> at: >>> >>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY >>> >>> and click on the "Roadmap" view. >>> >>> I've deferred the fixing of a few issues but there are currently still 5 >>> issues blocking these releases. If any of these issues were reported by >>> you and/or assigned to you please review them and confirm that the "must >>> fix" status is warranted or remove it (or fix it if it is a bug and two >>> committers accept the fix). >>> >>> Please test the java5 and java6 federated build and report your results >>> to help prepare for our releases. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Mark >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Oliver Deakin >> Unless stated otherwise above: >> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number >> 741598. >> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU >> >> > > > -- > Catherine Hope > > Unless stated otherwise above: > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number > 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire > PO6 3AU > -- Catherine Hope Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
