Hi Regis,
I think the patch originator need to re-license the patch to APL v2, > otherwise, the > patch may not be taken. > I just got a response from Patrick Steele-Idem, the contributor of the patch. He asks what's required and suggests this: "I hearby state that my patch to the jpathwatch library is licensed under APL v2 (Apache portable license [1])" (where [1] is http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0) Would that be enough? Where would he have to post this? On this mailing list? From http://download.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/ > > "Your use of this page (http://download.oracle.com/javase/tutorial (Last > Updated 02/23/2011)) and all the material on pages under "The Java > Tutorials" banner is subject to the Java SE Tutorial Copyright and License. > Additionally, any example code contained in any of these Java Tutorials > pages is licensed under the Code Sample License." [1] > > [1] http://developers.sun.com/license/berkeley_license.html > > It looks like BSD license, that is compatible with APL v2, but I'm not > lawyer, can't 100% sure about this. > > So who can we ask? Cheers, Uwe
