Konstantin, I don't think all the developers are aware of the differences between CTR and RTC. Would you care to elaborate on the contribution protocols?
Thanks! On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]> wrote: > I am the big advocate of CTR model and has been pushing it in a number of > the > projects before. However, for the very early ones like Hawq right now, RTC > might make more sense: it takes time to learn how to add new trusty people > to > the community; also for new committers it helps to learn the code faster by > doing the mandatory reviews. But before you know it, I will be doing rounds > here pushing for CTR ;) > > Cos > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 03:11PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > Hi! > > > > just wanted to say what I said on HAWQ-7, but > > since not all of us are watching that JIRA, I think > > it would be useful to repeat it here. > > > > While there's nothing wrong with lazy consensus, > > but initially I'd suggest staying with RTC model. > > Thus +1 from somebody else should be explicitly > > required. > > > > I don't think there's any disagreement, but I just > > wanted to have it explicitly mentioned. > > > > Thanks, > > Roman. >
