Lei, what are your thoughts on the required level of contribution to be considered?
Thanks, Roman. On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 11:57 PM, Lei Chang <[email protected]> wrote: > add the link: > http://community.apache.org/newcommitter.html#new-committer-process > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Lei Chang <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Here is the common apache process for becoming a new committer. >> >> Cheers >> Lei >> >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Xin! >>> >>> this is a great question. Certainly this is something that HAWQ >>> community has to ponder soon enough. There are no hard and >>> fast rules, but here are a few things that typically would prompt >>> considering somebody a candidate for a committer: >>> 1. participation in the mailing list conversations >>> 2. code contributions (patches submitted to JIRA or PRs) committed >>> by existing committers >>> 3. documentation contributions >>> 4. wiki/social media contributions >>> 5. review of patches submitted by others >>> 6. reviews of release candidates >>> 7. bug reports >>> >>> If the behavior of contributing to the project in a variety of different >>> ways >>> continues for a few months I think it is reasonable to expect that your >>> merit should be considered as a basis for commitership. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Roman. >>> >>> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Xin Zhang <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > Hi HAWQ devs, >>> > >>> > I recently started contributing to apache-hawq. >>> > >>> > I am wondering what's bar to be considered at a committer, and what's >>> the >>> > process to submit a request, and when PMC can review the request. >>> > >>> > I am pretty new to OSS as well as this project, and any guidance is >>> greatly >>> > appreciated. >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Thanks, >>> > Shin >>> >> >>
