Hi, Roman, Thank you for the suggestion! I've put a pom.xml for hawq, it contains the exclude list. run "mvn apache-rat:rat" can get a report. No unknown Licenses now.
Regards, On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 6:52 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 3:13 AM, Wen Lin <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, Caleb, > > The files you mentioned that need to be removed is recorded in Jira: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAWQ-186 > > Lirong is working on this. > > > > Hi, Roman, > > Today I add license headers for some source files. The latest status is : > > Summary > > ------- > > Generated at: 2015-12-07T18:59:07+08:00 > > Notes: 78 > > Binaries: 786 > > Archives: 20 > > Standards: 5834 > > > > Apache Licensed: 1435 > > Generated Documents: 0 > > > > JavaDocs are generated and so license header is optional > > Generated files do not required license headers > > > > 4383 Unknown Licenses > > > > Some files are from 3rd party, like postgres, gtest, gmock, etc. I am > > wondering, is it correct to add license header for these files? > > Some other files are .out, .ans, .sgml etc, when use apache-rat to add > > license header for a folder, these files will be ignored by apache-rat > > You don't need to change license headers on files coming from > other projects (in fact you can NOT do that legally). > > You do, however, need to compile a very detailed list of exceptions > that you will pass to rat via -E/-e option: > http://creadur.apache.org/rat/apache-rat/index.html > > I would like these exception to be grouped and documented somehow > so that anybody reviewing the release can make sure why things > are on the list of exceptions. > > Thanks, > Roman. >
