Lei, can you please explicitly cast +1/-1 vote? Thanks, Roman.
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 7:50 PM, Lei Chang <[email protected]> wrote: > Look good! > > Run mvn verify, get: > > ***************************************************** > > Summary > > ------- > > Generated at: 2016-01-24T19:50:43-08:00 > > Notes: 5 > > Binaries: 0 > > Archives: 0 > > Standards: 2627 > > Apache Licensed: 1796 > > Generated Documents: 0 > > JavaDocs are generated and so license header is optional > > Generated files do not required license headers > > 0 Unknown Licenses > > ******************************* > > Unapproved licenses: > > ******************************* > > Cheers > > Lei Chang > > On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 9:14 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Caleb Welton <[email protected]> wrote: >> > First question for me is: >> > - We have a couple existing jiras on IP clearance, including >> > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAWQ-184 >> > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAWQ-207 >> > >> > In particular if HAWQ-184 has *not* been resolved then how are we clear >> of >> > our IP issues? I see that there was a commit associated with the issue, >> so >> > perhaps this is just a lack of jira hygiene? >> >> I wasn't too eager to resolve 184 until the vote passes, >> as for 207 -- that ended up being fixed in a different way >> and I resolve it as not applicable anymore. >> >> Thanks, >> Roman. >>
