Hmmm, so who has access to that infrastructure?

We should be running the basic installcheck-good at a minimum on the latest
checkins IMO

Cheers,
Ivan

On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Noa Horn <[email protected]> wrote:

> Just to clarify, the jenkins build only compiles HAWQ. It doesn't run any
> tests (unit tests or installcheck-good) at the moment.
>
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Ivan Novick <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > What is required to fix it?
> >
> > Is the Jenkins config need fixing?
> >
> > We need to see the output of the build and the tests.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Ivan
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Caleb Welton <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Filing a jira is a good start.  This seems like an important priority.
> > > Anyone want to volunteer to get this resolved?
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Ting(Goden) Yao <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I have filed this JIRA to fix the issue:
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAWQ-331
> > > > still open right now.
> > > > -Goden
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 9:57 AM Caleb Welton <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > We have integration with the Apache Jenkins instance for every pull
> > > > > request[1].  However if you go into the console output of those
> > Jenkins
> > > > > builds you can see that:
> > > > > a) Every change for a while has been failing to complete the build.
> > > > > b) Everything is still reporting green.
> > > > >
> > > > > [1] <https://builds.apache.org/job/HAWQ-build-pullrequest/>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 8:17 PM, Ivan Novick <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Do we have output of install check good (red/green) tests showing
> > on
> > > a
> > > > CI
> > > > > > somewhere for open source Hawq based on the latest code checkins
> to
> > > > > MASTER?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Do we have a way to confirm the latest code on MASTER is green?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > Ivan
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to