Why not use `push -f` instead?

xunzhang

2016-07-19 11:19 GMT+08:00 Radar Da lei <[email protected]>:

> When I was merging Hong's commit 'HAWQ-933' to branch '2.0.0.0-incubating',
> below  7 commits are merged by accidents.
>
> HAWQ-894. Add feature test for polymorphism with new test framework
> HAWQ-808. Refactor feature test for external_oid with new framework.
> HAWQ-894. Add missed answer file for polymorphism case
> HAWQ-924. Refactor feature test for querycontext with new test framework
> HAWQ-918. Fix memtuple forming bug when null-saved size is larger than
> 32763 bytes
> HAWQ-917. Refactor feature tests for data type check with new googletest
> framework
> HAWQ-896. Add feature test for create table with new test framework
>
> Sorry for the wrong merge, now I'm trying to revert these commits. But
> revert so many commits looks ugly and will be confused, so I proposal let
> me re-create the branch. The new created branch will be the same as before,
> then the branch can keep clean.
>
> Any comments? Thanks.
>
> Regards,
> Radar
>
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Hong Wu <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > HAWQ-933 is fixed(69f3c9026892bc9c6937ed132fa45716d7912a8f
> > <
> >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-hawq/commit/69f3c9026892bc9c6937ed132fa45716d7912a8f
> > >),
> > thank you for pointing this out. I will cherry-pick it to
> > 2.0.0.0-incubating soon.
> >
> > Best
> > xunzhang
> >
> > 2016-07-19 4:47 GMT+08:00 Goden Yao <[email protected]>:
> >
> > > Filed a JIRA for these warnings.
> > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAWQ-933
> > > Can someone who's familiar with gpnetbench* code, take a look and fix
> > them
> > > ?
> > >
> > > -Goden
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 11:04 AM Goden Yao <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > just compiled the latest from git pull.
> > > >
> > > > Build was successful with a few warnings, we probably want to make
> them
> > > > clean.
> > > >
> > > > gpnetbenchClient.c:36:6: warning: no previous prototype for function
> > > 'usage' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> > > > void usage()
> > > >      ^
> > > > gpnetbenchServer.c:34:6: warning: no previous prototype for function
> > > 'usage' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> > > > void usage()
> > > >      ^
> > > > gpnetbenchClient.c:198:14: warning: comparison of unsigned
> expression <
> > > 0 is always false [-Wtautological-compare]
> > > >                 if (retval < 0)
> > > >                     ~~~~~~ ^ ~
> > > > gpnetbenchClient.c:231:6: warning: no previous prototype for function
> > > 'print_headers' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> > > > void print_headers()
> > > >      ^
> > > > gpnetbenchClient.c:33:6: note: this declaration is not a prototype;
> add
> > > 'void' to make it a prototype for a zero-parameter function
> > > > void print_headers();
> > > >      ^
> > > >                    void
> > > > 1 warning generated.
> > > > 3 warnings generated.
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 3:28 AM Radar Da lei [email protected]
> > > > <http://mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I have merged fixes for 'HAWQ-622', 'HAWQ-926', 'HAWQ-915' into
> > > >> '2.0.0.0-incubating' branch.
> > > >>
> > > >> There seems no blocker issues left.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Regards,
> > > >> Radar
> > > >>
> > > >> On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 5:05 AM, Goden Yao <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Thanks Alan.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Just a reminder - when you do commits in master, please check the
> > JIRA
> > > >> > associated with it and if it's labeled "2.0.0.0-incubating" in fix
> > > >> version,
> > > >> > please port your commits to the release branch and close the JIRA.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I can see in the past a couple days,
> > > >> >
> > > >> >    - HAWQ-915 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAWQ-915>
> RAT
> > is
> > > >> >    failing on the latest maste
> > > >> >    - HAWQ-926 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAWQ-926>
> > Remove
> > > >> >    pycrypto from source code
> > > >> >
> > > >> > They're both needed in this release but I don't see them being
> > ported
> > > to
> > > >> > the release branch and as the JIRAs stay open, I'm not sure if the
> > > >> > assignees plan to augment the commits or not.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Please check. thank you.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > -Goden
> > > >>
> > > > ​
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to