Seconding Lisa's query. Assuming this is only for compatibility, and should not be documented?
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Lisa Owen (JIRA) <[email protected]> wrote: > > [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAWQ-1028?page= > com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment- > tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15446967#comment-15446967 ] > > Lisa Owen commented on HAWQ-1028: > --------------------------------- > > i assume we do not want the "added back in" -d option on hawq state to be > visible to the user (i.e. documented). is this a correct assumption? > > > Add '-d' option for hawq state to be compatible with Ambari > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Key: HAWQ-1028 > > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAWQ-1028 > > Project: Apache HAWQ > > Issue Type: Task > > Components: Command Line Tools > > Reporter: Radar Lei > > Assignee: Radar Lei > > Fix For: 2.0.1.0-incubating > > > > > > Previously we removed the legacy option '-d' '--datadir' from 'hawq > state' command. This option is used to specify the master data directory, > but we never used it in our command line tools. > > Now we found this unused option is used by current version Ambari, and > will cause Ambari check HAWQ status failed if we removed it. So to be > compatible with Ambari, we need to add it back until Ambari do not use this > option. > > > > -- > This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA > (v6.3.4#6332) >
