-1 Need more information. What is the impact (are any useful files lost)? Are any files removed?
-=e On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Ming Li <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I heard from someone complain about the slowness to git clone hawq repo. > And we have almost finished large code modification for apache release, I > think it is opt time for us to shrink git repo size now. > > I followed the steps in > http://stevelorek.com/how-to-shrink-a-git-repository.html, deleted some > large file which is not useful in current build process, it can reduce > size from 174M to 100M. > > However it need all clone to be re-clone again after git push the changed > repo. So I am writing this email to ask for voting it. > > Thanks. > -- *Ed Espino* *[email protected] <[email protected]>*
