Unless the license header could not be practically added (e.g. .ans files for test). You will need to add the file(s) in pom.xml to avoid RAT check for this case.
2017-01-28 5:07 GMT+08:00 Roman Shaposhnik <[email protected]>: > Actually, you really are required to apply license header to every file > nowdays. > > Thanks, > Roman. > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 11:11 AM, Shivram Mani <[email protected]> > wrote: > > In that case, can we just apply the license header to every file ? > > These files in question are configurations which would also be controlled > > by Mgmt tools such as Ambari. > > > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 8:50 AM, David Yozie <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> We had the same question around the docs source files. Seems like > there's > >> roughly an even split of projects that do/don't include the license in > each > >> file. > >> > >> -David > >> > >> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Shivram Mani <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Are we supposed to add the Apache License header comment to every > file in > >> > the hawq repo ? > >> > Currently the classpath files under > >> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-hawq/tree/master/ > >> > pxf/pxf-service/src/main/resources > >> > don't have the header info. > >> > Is that something we need to add to those files as well ? > >> > > >> > -- > >> > shivram mani > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > shivram mani >
