Ruilong, I spoke with Roman this morning. He indicated there is no need to identify binding/non-binding votes by the PPMC members of Apache incubating projects. Our incubating project dev votes are simply votes. I incorrectly assumed we identified our votes in this way. As long HAWQ is incubating, only the votes by the IPMC will be of the binding/non-binding form. Sorry for the confusion.
Regards, -=e On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 9:36 AM, Ed Espino <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for the correction Roman. I miss-interpreted my membership in the > IPMC versus the PMC and the use of identifying one's vote as binding or > non-binding. Can you provide some guidance on the proper usage of binding > vs. non-binding at it applies to a podling's IPMC members? > > Thanks, > -=e > > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 3:53 AM, Ruilong Huo <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hi All, >> > >> > The VOTE for releasing Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating is now >> > closed. With a total of one +1 binding vote, six +1 not binding vote, >> and >> > no -1 vote, the VOTE passes. Overall binding vote breakdown is as >> follows: >> > >> > +1 (binding) 1 >> > ---------------------------- >> > * Ed Espino >> >> This is incorrect. Ed's vote is NOT binding. >> >> Thanks, >> Roman. >> > > > > -- > *Ed Espino* > -- *Ed Espino*
