Thank you very much! Lirong 在 27/02/2018 11:31, Ivan Weng 写道: > Thanks Lirong. It's a good suggestion. Will evaluate the benefit and cost > before making decision. > > Also I think it's better to make the tuple batch interfaces more general > and its internal format could be replaced if possible. > > > Regards, > Ivan > > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 6:59 PM, Lirong Jian <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Have you guy consider using Apache Arrow format (http://arrow.apache.org/) >> as the in-memory tuple batch structure for vectorized execution? I think >> the goal of Apache Arrow project matches the one of vectorized execution >> perfectly, and its community is quite active, although the implementation >> of Apache Arrow format is far away from the implementation of >> PostgreSQL/GPDB/HAWQ tuple structure , which means the engineering efforts >> needed would be huge. >> >> Just my two cents. >> >> Lirong >> >> Lirong Jian >> HashData Inc. >> >> 2018-02-26 13:40 GMT+08:00 Hongxu Ma (JIRA) <[email protected]>: >> >>> Hongxu Ma created HAWQ-1591: >>> ------------------------------- >>> >>> Summary: Common tuple batch structure for vectorized >> execution >>> Key: HAWQ-1591 >>> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAWQ-1591 >>> Project: Apache HAWQ >>> Issue Type: Sub-task >>> Components: Query Execution >>> Reporter: Hongxu Ma >>> Assignee: Lei Chang >>> Fix For: backlog >>> >>> >>> A common tuple batch structure for vectorized execution, holds the tuples >>> which be transfered between vectorized operators. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA >>> (v7.6.3#76005) >>>
-- Regards, Hongxu.
