+1 to Lei. He is worthy of the title of Apache HAWQ PMC Chairman. 2018-06-01 9:44 GMT+08:00 Yi JIN <y...@apache.org>:
> +1 to Lei, I fully support Lei Change as Apache HAWQ project PMC Chairman, > he deserves this role, not only outstanding contributions to this project > in a very long period till today also his solid leadership and vision. > > Best, > Yi Jin > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 3:17 AM, Ed Espino <esp...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Ruilong, > > > > I also give my full support for Lei Chang as the Apache HAWQ project's > > initial PMC Chairman. His leadership and vision have contributed > immensely > > to the project. > > > > Regards, > > -=e > > > > On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 6:32 AM, Ruilong Huo <h...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > Great progress towards Apache HAWQ graduation! Thanks Radar for pushing > > > this forward! > > > > > > I would like to nominate Lei Chang as the PMC Chair. He initiated HAWQ > > > project several years ago, led the development, brought it to Apache > > > incubation, and has always been active in HAWQ community to make it a > > > world-leading big data product as well as a successfully Apache > project. > > > There is no doubt that he is perfect for the role. And I believe he > will > > > continue to share his insights and go even further with HAWQ after > > > graduation. > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Ruilong Huo > > > > > > > > > At 2018-05-31 15:40:42, "Radar Lei" <r...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > > >Just find some good material for nominating chair from Roman's email, > > > >thanks Roman. > > > > > > > >I think we can follow this to nominate a Chair in this thread too. > Guys > > > >please help to nominate or self-nominate. Thanks a lot. > > > > > > > >See: > > > >At the very minimum your resolution will contain: 1. A name of the > > project > > > >2. A list of proposed PMC 3. A proposed PMC chair > > > > > > > >On #3 I typically recommend podlings I mento to setup a rotating chair > > > >policy. This is, in no way, an ASF requirement so feel free to ignore > > it, > > > >but it worked well before. The chair will be expected up for rotation > > > every > > > >year. It will be more that ok for the same person to self-nominate > once > > > the > > > >year is up -- but at the same time it'll be up to the same person to > > > >actually kick off a thread asking if anybody else is interested in > > serving > > > >as a chair for the next year. Of course, if there multiple candidates > > > there > > > >will have to be a vote. > > > > > > > > > > > >Regards, > > > >Radar > > > > > > > >On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 10:05 PM, Radar Lei <r...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > > > > > > >> Thanks Roman. > > > >> > > > >> This make sense, I will start to draft the resolution. BTW, we would > > > need > > > >> to nominate a chair, I guess it's the last piece we need to draft > the > > > >> resolution. > > > >> > > > >> Regards, > > > >> Radar > > > >> > > > >> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 11:24 AM, Roman Shaposhnik < > > > ro...@shaposhnik.org> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 11:37 PM, Radar Lei <r...@pivotal.io> > wrote: > > > >>> > Hi Roman, > > > >>> > > > > >>> > We have confirmed with each HAWQ committer whether they want to > > > remain > > > >>> with > > > >>> > HAWQ project. As a summary, 37 PPMC members(including two > mentors) > > > and > > > >>> 7 > > > >>> > committers confirmed they want to remain with HAWQ. [1] The total > > > >>> committers > > > >>> > number 44 seems pretty close with PPMC member number 37, is it > good > > > >>> enough > > > >>> > to make PMC == committers as our graduation resolution? > > > >>> > > > >>> PMC == committers in this case makes perfect sense to me! > > > >>> > > > >>> > Should we update the whimsy and project webpage now or do update > > > after > > > >>> graduation? > > > >>> > > > >>> It really doesn't matter much. Your next step is to draft a > > resolution > > > >>> similar to: > > > >>> https://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/ms > > > >>> g56982.html > > > >>> > > > >>> and start a [DISCUSS] thread similar to the above. > > > >>> > > > >>> Makes sense? > > > >>> > > > >>> Thanks, > > > >>> Roman. > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >
