Lets not call it 0.21. I wanted to call it 0.66.0 so we could do a logo for it: http://people.apache.org/~stack/66.jpg
I'm good w/ 0.90.0 or 0.30.0. St.Ack On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Todd Lipcon <t...@cloudera.com> wrote: > Hi HBasers, > > Time for the second proposal of the day! > > I'd like to start a discussion around the version number of the upcoming > "durable HBase" release. The release I'm referring to is the one currently > being worked towards on trunk, and the one that FB and Cloudera plan to work > with for production clusters round about Q3 2010. > > The current name for this release is 0.21. I think this is going to cause > user confusion due to the previous "lockstep versioning" that HBase has had > with regard to Hadoop. I think many people will assume they need to use > Hadoop 0.21 (being billed as an unstable release at least for 0.21.0) and > generally not quite understand why our version number is the same if we have > no tie to the Hadoop version. So, I am generally -1 on calling this next > HBase release 0.21.0. > > The other factor is that I think we all see this upcoming release as a major > step up from 0.20. Namely, it provides true durability of every write, much > improved cluster stability, a new build system, replication, and countless > other improvements that everyone's been cranking on. I'm sure given the > number of people now working on the project, we'll see even a few more great > improvements pop up before we're ready to freeze. > > Some have suggested we jump all the way to HBase 1.0. I think this is a bit > ambitious, as 1.0 implies a level of API stability we're not quite ready to > commit to. Perhaps we can go there some time next year, but don't want to > open that can of worms yet :) > > So, beyond not liking either 0.21 or 1.0, I don't have a strong opinion. > Some have suggested 0.90, as it is lexically much bigger than 0.20 but > clearly not 1.0 yet. Others have suggested 0.30, to give us room to go to > 0.40, 0.50, etc before a 1.0. > > Thoughts? > > -Todd > > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera >