OK. Backing it out. Will put up new RC w/o HBASE-1537 in a sec. St.Ack
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> wrote: > When this first went in we were making an incompatible branch release > already. I think the current situation is pretty close. > > However, IMO let's just do this on trunk. > > The current very simple approach works for some straightforward cases but I > have a dev group reporting some odd behavior that I need to dig into next > week. Doing this right may be more complicated. > > - Andy > > --- On Sat, 6/19/10, Dave Latham <lat...@davelink.net> wrote: > >> From: Dave Latham <lat...@davelink.net> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.5 Release Candidate 4 as >> hbase-0.20.5? >> To: dev@hbase.apache.org >> Date: Saturday, June 19, 2010, 8:59 AM >> The inclusion of HBASE-1537 changes >> the Scan serialization format, making >> clients incompatible with previous 0.20.x releases. >> Is that ok? >> >> Dave >> >> On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 12:33 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> >> wrote: >> >> > I've posted an hbase 0.20.5 release candidate 4 here: >> > >> > >> >http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.5-candidate-4/<http://people.apache.org/%7Estack/hbase-0.20.5-candidate-4/> >> > >> > There have been 24 issues addressed since the release >> of hbase-0.20.4 [1]. >> > >> > Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.20.5? >> > >> > Please take it for a test spin if you have a >> chance. Vote closes >> > Wednesday, June 23rd. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Your HBase Team >> > >> > 1. http://su.pr/1prW9y >> > >> > > > > >
