On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Todd Lipcon <t...@cloudera.com> wrote: > > Quick update on the development branch 0.89.20100621. >
(Todd you want to explain the version number or do you want me to?) > I think the following patches still need to go in: > - HBASE-2767 (failed tests building with HDFS-1209) Reviewed. > - HBASE-2729 (fix bug when flush hits IOE) Please paste patch into issue so can review (review.hbase.org is down) > - I'd also like to disable the TestAcidGuarantees test in this branch, since > that is a known bug. Grand. > - I'd like to commit a short KNOWN_BUGS file which describes a few of the > open issues that we're currently working on. Certainly doesn't have to be > exhaustive list of all open JIRAs, but just a few things that users may run > into. > Yeah. Just call out the biggies and refer use to the short list (ahem) of other issues we have against next major release. > Some performance issues were raised during testing at StumbleUpon -- any > luck figuring those out, Ryan/Stack? It would be good to address them for > the dev release, since it sounds like the RS barely makes progress when this > bug is triggered. > Yeah, its a beaut. Sucks all resources for some period of time until it gets over first flush then its good to go for a while at least. Still trying to figure it. > Given the above, I'd like to see if we can get the above two jiras reviewed > and committed later tonight, and I'll try to roll a release candidate before > I go to sleep. I think the correct way to release in this maven land is to > simply do an svn export and vote on that, and then separately do an > assembly:assembly tar as a binary release artifact (since assembly tar > doesn't include unpacked source, etc). > Why not just vote on the assembly? Thats what we'd run? If you do a site before assembly:assembly, you'll even have docs (mvn install site assembly;assembly). The source is there to review if wanted. Doing an svn export will have to build ourselves. St.Ack
