Fix for hbase-2774 has been committed. Some doc fixup has also been done. We're good to go on RC1 I'd say. St.Ack
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Ryan Rawson <ryano...@gmail.com> wrote: > We really need: HBASE-2774 without it people could run into really > bad performance issues. > > it works well for both me and stack on different hardware profiles > (older intel xeons vs newer i7s) and solves the problem. > > -ryan > > On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Todd Lipcon <t...@cloudera.com> wrote: >> I've built src and binary releases from the tip of branch 0.89.20100621. >> I've also made a new tag for this release candidate. You can find the >> tarballs at: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~todd/hbase-0.89.20100621.rc0/ >> >> MD5 sums: >> >> 6f3dd13794260c09e5d68c071edf5dc1 hbase-0.89.20100621-bin.tar.gz >> d00df1bbcc9d11f6483822333155b5e3 hbase-0.89.20100621-src.tar.gz >> >> GPG signatures are in the same directory. >> >> I would like to propose releasing this release candidate as HBase >> 0.89.20100621. >> >> Please see the previous thread for more information about the purpose of >> this release candidate - in particular, we're not making any guarantees that >> this is bug free. I hope we can release this rc with no follow up patches >> unless anything is extremely broken. We'll do another release like this in a >> few weeks after the new master code has been stabilized a bit, and of course >> anything else that has gone into trunk will go into there. >> >> If we could complete voting by Friday that would be excellent. >> >> Thanks, >> -Todd >> >> -- >> Todd Lipcon >> Software Engineer, Cloudera >> >
