FYI, TestHLog unit test fails for me in same way it fails on TRUNK (but I'm leaving my +1 in place). St.Ack
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > It basically works. > > Ran small YCSB test against small cluster. Ten clients. 5 nodes > doing 50/50 read/write against 10M row table. At same time ran MR job > of ten clients doing short 100 row scans. No wackyness in logs. > Completed. > > I did not try killing nodes to test recoveries. > > Doc. looks fine. > > St.Ack > > On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 8:21 AM, Todd Lipcon <[email protected]> wrote: >> I've built src and binary releases from the tip of branch 0.89.20100621. >> I've also made a new tag for this release candidate, rc1. You can find the >> tarballs at: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~todd/hbase-0.89.20100621.rc1/ >> >> MD5 sums: >> >> 5c4281c2cab6c686dc9f2d1e2b624d53 hbase-0.89.20100621-bin.tar.gz >> 8a581e0dc2176e83a2c0c05da2456535 hbase-0.89.20100621-src.tar.gz >> >> GPG signatures are in the same directory. >> >> I would like to propose releasing this release candidate as HBase >> 0.89.20100621. >> >> Changes since last release candidate: >> HBASE-2774 Spin in ReadWriteConsistencyControl eating CPU (load > 40) >> and >> no progress running YCSB on clean cluster start >> HBASE-2783 Quick edit of 'Getting Started' for development release >> 0.89.x >> >> >> Please see the previous thread for more information about the purpose of >> this release candidate - in particular, we're not making any guarantees that >> this is bug free. I hope we can release this rc with no follow up patches >> unless anything is extremely broken. We'll do another release like this in a >> few weeks after the new master code has been stabilized a bit, and of course >> anything else that has gone into trunk will go into there. >> >> If we could complete voting by Friday that would be excellent. >> >> Thanks, >> -Todd >> >> -- >> Todd Lipcon >> Software Engineer, Cloudera >> >> -- >> Todd Lipcon >> Software Engineer, Cloudera >> >
