Master rewrite branch is a feature branch off of trunk. The plan is that once it is finished, it will be merged back into trunk and released as part of 0.90.
JG > -----Original Message----- > From: Ted Yu [mailto:yuzhih...@gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2010 11:56 AM > To: dev@hbase.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.6 Release Candidate 1 > as hbase-0.20.6? > > Jonathan: > Is HBASE-2473 related to new load balancer in Master rewrite branch ? > Can you elaborate on the relationship between Master rewrite branch and > 0.90 > release ? > > Thanks > > On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Jonathan Gray <jg...@facebook.com> > wrote: > > > HBASE-2473 is a new feature. 0.21 is equivalent to 0.89 and 0.90 > (trunk). > > 0.89 are dev releases off trunk which will be release as 0.90. > > > > 0.20 branch is an old branch that will not have new features added to > it, > > just bug fixes. All new features should be done against trunk only. > > > > http://hbaseblog.com/2010/07/04/hug11-hbase-0-90-preview-wrap-up/ > > > > There's more info about the versions in the deck on that blog post. > > > > JG > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Ted Yu [mailto:yuzhih...@gmail.com] > > > Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2010 7:30 AM > > > To: dev@hbase.apache.org > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.6 Release Candidate > 1 > > > as hbase-0.20.6? > > > > > > Since HBASE-2473 is marked fixed for 0.21, some advice regarding > the > > > roadmap > > > for 0.21 vs. 0.20.6 vs 0.89 would help us decide which version to > use. > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 10:08 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > I don't see HBASE-2473 among the 8 fixes of 0.20.6 > > > > I checked 0.20.5 source code and didn't seem to find the patch > there > > > > either. > > > > > > > > Please advise. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Dave Latham > <lat...@davelink.net> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> For what it's worth, I've been running the 0.20 branch at > r963948, > > > which > > > >> is > > > >> the same as this release candidate except for > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2837. Haven't had > any > > > >> problems. > > > >> > > > >> Dave > > > >> > > > >> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 9:15 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > I've posted an hbase 0.20.6 release candidate 5 here: > > > >> > > > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.6-candidate- > <http://people.apache.org/%7Estack/hbase-0.20.6-candidate-> > > > 1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Estack/hbase-0.20.6-candidate-1/> > > > >> <http://people.apache.org/%7Estack/hbase-0.20.6-candidate-1/> > > > >> > > > > >> > There have been 8 fixes since the release of hbase-0.20.5 [1]. > > > >> > > > > >> > Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.20.6? > > > >> > > > > >> > Please take it for a test spin if you have a chance. Vote > closes > > > >> > Monday July 26th. > > > >> > > > > >> > Thanks, > > > >> > Your HBase Team > > > >> > > > > >> > 1. http://su.pr/1kRdZN > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
