-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://review.cloudera.org/r/418/#review533
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Looks great to me.  Few comments below.


src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/client/HBaseFsck.java
<http://review.cloudera.org/r/418/#comment2127>

    How do I supply different implementation of ErrorReporter?



src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/client/HBaseFsck.java
<http://review.cloudera.org/r/418/#comment2128>

    What about logs dir and old logs dir -- we skipping them here?



src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/client/TestHBaseFsck.java
<http://review.cloudera.org/r/418/#comment2130>

    White space.  Better remove it if you'd avoid wrath of BenĂ´it.


- stack


On 2010-07-28 16:22:47, Todd Lipcon wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://review.cloudera.org/r/418/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2010-07-28 16:22:47)
> 
> 
> Review request for hbase, stack, dhruba borthakur, and Kannan Muthukkaruppan.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> Bunch of changes to the HBaseFsck tool to detect a wider variety of issues 
> and to make it easier to add "fix" support for these problems in the future.
> 
> 
> This addresses bug HBASE-2887.
>     http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2887
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/client/HBaseFsck.java 19cdec1 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/client/MetaScanner.java 5f8b909 
>   src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/client/TestHBaseFsck.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: http://review.cloudera.org/r/418/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Tested an earlier variation of this patch against my cluster in various 
> screwed up states. This patch adds a basic unit test but it could be improved 
> to use a mock cluster and test more variations.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Todd
> 
>

Reply via email to