Although, I've been doing lots of tests on 0.89.2010726 patched with Kannan's fix and it works pretty well. Also replication was enabled, and was tested too.
J-D On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <[email protected]> wrote: > -1 > > Because of HBASE-2755, I cannot even boot a cluster properly. > > J-D > > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:27 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: >> Today I made a branch from TRUNK named 0.89.2010726 and then built >> from the tip of this branch a candidate to become the second in our >> series of 'developer releases' that will take us to 0.90.0, the next >> major version of hbase (See >> http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Hbase/HBaseVersions for more on what >> these 0.89.x releases are all about). >> >> Source binary and source tar balls are available here: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.89.20100726-candidate-1/ >> >> You can also browse the candidate documentation here: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.89.20100726-candidate-1/hbase-0.89.20100726/docs/ >> >> Issues resolved since >> http://apache.tradebit.com/pub/hbase/hbase-0.89.20100621/, our first >> 0.89.x release, are roughly ~80 issues odd including our first cut at >> a working replication: See http://su.pr/2lZsHk >> >> Shall we release this candidate as the second in our 0.89.x series of >> developer releases? >> >> Please see previous threads on 0.89 releases for more information >> about the purpose of this release candidate - in particular, this >> 'developer release' is for those who can tolerate risk and who are >> willing to give feedback in advance of our next major release. We're >> not making any guarantees that this is bug free. Its definitely not >> for production deploys. >> >> We'll do another release like this in a few weeks after the new master >> code has gone in. >> >> Please vote by Monday, August 2nd. >> >> Thanks, >> St.Ack >> >
