BTW I'm +1, I ran the unit tests, did cluster testing with YCSB, and deployed it in almost all our environments here (this will be completed before the voting period ends).
J-D On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <[email protected]> wrote: > It's time for another DR since the new master code is about to be > merged in and we have a few fixes and improvements that'd beneficiate > from more exposure. I branched from trunk this morning and created a > new tag. (See http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Hbase/HBaseVersions for > more on what these 0.89.x releases are all about) > > Source binary and source tar balls are available here: > > http://people.apache.org/~jdcryans/hbase-0.89.20100830-candidate-1/ > > You can also browse the candidate documentation here: > > http://people.apache.org/~jdcryans/hbase-0.89.20100830-candidate-1/hbase-0.89.20100830/docs/ > > Issues resolved since 0.89.20100726, our second 0.89.x release, are > roughly ~23 issues odd including fixed deadlocks, better handling of > IOEs during splits and improvements for filters: see > http://su.pr/2HwiUe > > Shall we release this candidate as the third in our 0.89.x series of > developer releases? > > Please see previous threads on 0.89 releases for more information > about the purpose of this release candidate - in particular, this > 'developer release' is for those who can tolerate risk and who are > willing to give feedback in advance of our next major release. We're > not making any guarantees that this is bug free. Its definitely not > for production deploys. > > We'll do another release like this in a few weeks after the new master > code has gone in. > > Please vote by Monday, September 6th. > > Thanks, > J-D >
