Yes, there are way more changes/improvements made beyond the initial scope of working master failover / zk-based region transitions. Lots of cleanup, removal of many of the nasty bits we've always hated, and the groundwork is laid for a lot of future improvements.
I'm not apprehensive. I think many of the points raised are valid, but my concerns have mostly been addressed at this point. I'm going to be spending the next 10 days or so helping stabilize and test. We'll see where we get by then. JG > -----Original Message----- > From: Andrew Purtell [mailto:apurt...@apache.org] > Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 3:47 AM > To: dev@hbase.apache.org > Subject: Re: old master to 0.90 and new master to 0.92? (was RE: > Millions of photos into Hbase) > > Thanks. I'm going to try it out right away. > > > From: Ryan Rawson > > I've been using the new master a bit, and the improvements are just > > too dramatic to ignore or delay. Instant table transitions, clusters > > that actually shut down, etc, etc. > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > If JG is apprehensive about putting the new master > > into 0.90, that's good enough for me. But I'll vote +0. I'm > > too unfamiliar with the details. > > > >
