-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Test set: org.apache.hadoop.hbase.rest.TestScannersWithFilters
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 20.781 sec <<< 
FAILURE!
testScannersWithFilters(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.rest.TestScannersWithFilters)  
Time elapsed: 20.759 sec  <<< ERROR!
java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 1
        at 
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.Result.getColumnLatest(Result.java:265)
        at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.Result.getValue(Result.java:279)
        at 
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.HConnectionManager$HConnectionImplementation.locateRegionInMeta(HConnectionManager.java:690)
        at 
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.HConnectionManager$HConnectionImplementation.locateRegion(HConnectionManager.java:536)
        at 
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.HConnectionManager$HConnectionImplementation.locateRegion(HConnectionManager.java:507)
        at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.HTable.<init>(HTable.java:166)
        at 
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.HBaseClusterTestCase.hBaseClusterSetup(HBaseClusterTestCase.java:111)
        at 
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.HBaseClusterTestCase.setUp(HBaseClusterTestCase.java:148)
        at 
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.rest.HBaseRESTClusterTestBase.setUp(HBaseRESTClusterTestBase.java:43)
        at 
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.rest.TestScannersWithFilters.setUp(TestScannersWithFilters.java:110)
        at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:132)
        at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:110)
        at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:128)
        at junit.framework.TestResult.run(TestResult.java:113)
        at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java:124)
        at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:232)
        at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:227)
        at 
org.junit.internal.runners.JUnit38ClassRunner.run(JUnit38ClassRunner.java:83)
        at 
org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4TestSet.execute(JUnit4TestSet.java:62)
        at 
org.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.executeTestSet(AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.java:140)
        at 
org.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.execute(AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.java:165)
        at org.apache.maven.surefire.Surefire.run(Surefire.java:107)
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
        at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
        at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
        at 
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.runSuitesInProcess(SurefireBooter.java:289)
        at 
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.main(SurefireBooter.java:1005)



--- On Tue, 10/5/10, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: Andrew Purtell <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [jira] Updated: (HBASE-3073) New APIs for Result, faster 
> implementation for some calls
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Tuesday, October 5, 2010, 7:00 PM
> This seems to have broken a number of
> REST tests. IndexOutOfBoundsException from Result#getValue
> out of o.a.h.h.rest.TestScannersWithFilters, etc.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
>     - Andy
> 
> 
> --- On Tue, 10/5/10, ryan rawson (JIRA) <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> 
> > From: ryan rawson (JIRA) <[email protected]>
> > Subject: [jira] Updated: (HBASE-3073) New APIs for
> Result, faster implementation for some calls
> > To: [email protected]
> > Date: Tuesday, October 5, 2010, 5:45 PM
> > 
> >      [ 
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3073?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
> > ]
> > 
> > ryan rawson updated HBASE-3073:
> > -------------------------------
> > 
> >     Resolution: Fixed
> >         Status: Resolved  (was:
> > Patch Available)
> > 
> > i committed this. thanks to all the reviewers!
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 




Reply via email to