Well, three +0 is enough to resolve this discussion I think. > From: stack > > My preference would be to not include CP in 0.90. > > If 'exposure' is the justification for getting CP into 0.90 > and it is admittedly still malleable -- is this right? -- > subject to change and 'experimental', doesn't it better > belong in TRUNK post a 0.90 branch? We could commit as soon > as end-of-day today if was wanted? Having it in branch > brings exposure and shows hbase projects committment to CP?
Since this appears to be the best possible outcome for us, we'll take it. - Andy
