-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://review.cloudera.org/r/1185/#review1835
-----------------------------------------------------------


Looking at this now, it's at completely different level than the new 
InternalScan we have.  That deals with scanner selection, this deals with an 
option in the QueryMatcher.  There are already a bunch of options in SQM so we 
could consolidate at some point, but it's only a single level so doesn't seem 
so bad.

I'm +1 on it (it's not my patch) but want to get someone else to review.

- Jonathan


On 2010-11-06 15:50:30, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://review.cloudera.org/r/1185/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2010-11-06 15:50:30)
> 
> 
> Review request for hbase, stack, Kannan Muthukkaruppan, and Ryan Rawson.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> This is a rebased patch from Amit.  This was internally reviewed but we may 
> want some minor modifications for 0.90 with the new InternalScanner, if 
> possible.  (suggestion from ryan on jira)
> 
> 
> This addresses bug HBASE-3048.
>     http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3048
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/MinorCompactingStoreScanner.java
>  1032175 
>   
> trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/ScanQueryMatcher.java
>  1032175 
>   trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/Store.java 1032175 
>   trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/StoreScanner.java 
> 1032175 
>   
> trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/TestCompaction.java 
> 1032175 
>   
> trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/TestMinorCompactingStoreScanner.java
>  1032175 
> 
> Diff: http://review.cloudera.org/r/1185/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Lot's of good new additions by Amit to TestCompaction which passes.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jonathan
> 
>

Reply via email to