I concur. Next week?
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > Good one. Want to make an issue J-D? > > Seems like this RC is sunk going by issues filed against it. If its > OK w/ you all.... lets let this RC hang out there a little longer to > see if the RC catches more bad bugs before we cut a new RC? > > St.Ack > > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Currently both trunk and 0.90's pom.xml are incomplete, we were >> relying on Ryan's repo have the thrift pom but now that it was changed >> to Stack's new comers cannot compile the project since that pom is >> missing. Reported by kzk9 on IRC. >> >> So either we had Ryan's repo back in the pom, or Stack copies the >> files to his own repo, or we add a FB's repo that has it. >> >> J-D >> >> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Agreed. Keep testing and keep the sinkers coming in so its the more >>> likely that the next RC we put out graduates. Make sure issues are >>> filed against 0.90.0. >>> Good stuff, >>> St.Ack >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Todd Lipcon <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> The web UI "split" and "compact" buttons are currently not hooked up - >>>> filed >>>> last night, will try to get a patch done today. >>>> >>>> The good news is I ran some YCSB tests and on the whole performance is much >>>> improved! >>>> >>>> I agree, let's keep going with this rc until people stop finding new >>>> issues, >>>> or we reach something that blocks further testing. >>>> >>>> -Todd >>>> >>>> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Gary Helmling <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> -1 on RC >>>>> >>>>> I opened HBASE-3235 for an issue with ICVs that should also sink the RC. >>>>> When a put and subsequent ICV go in with the same timestamp for the same >>>>> row/family/qualifier, the initial put masks the ICV, effectively causing >>>>> it >>>>> to disappear. There's a fix up on review board. >>>>> >>>>> We may want to give a couple more days for any other issues to shake out >>>>> as >>>>> well? >>>>> >>>>> Gary >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 4:53 AM, Mathias Herberts < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> > Hi, >>>>> > >>>>> > I just filed HBASE-3238 which appears to me as a blocker as HBase >>>>> > won't start if its zookeeper.parent.znode exists and HBase does not >>>>> > have the CREATE permission on this znode's parent znode. >>>>> > >>>>> > Mathias. >>>>> > >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Todd Lipcon >>>> Software Engineer, Cloudera >>>> >>> >> >
