Currently the single counter wouldn't be incremented because of this diversion. Should we keep the behavior same ?
Thanks On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > > How should we deal with early return by coprocessor ? > > if (coprocessorHost.preGetClosestRowBefore(row, family, result)) { > > return result; > > } > > I would assume that the above wouldn't increase read request count. > > > > It would be odd if the above request did not increment counters I'd > say. We did work to get to this point. I'd think it should be > reflected in counters somehow. I'd call it a read. > > St.Ack >
