Right, they go hand in hand. I saw the use case in multi call at RS where all the rows are sorted based on the row attribute.
Himanshu On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:33 AM, Gary Helmling <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 11:14 PM, Himanshu Vashishtha < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > For the least of it, one can get rid of "private byte[] referenceRow" > > attribute in Exec class I'd say (?). > > > > > Um, what would Row.getRow() return in that case? Sure, if you drop the Row > implementation, you can probably drop referenceRow too (the row key seems > to > be in context for any of the other places we would need it). > > > --gh >
